Re: spinlocks() are severely broken in 2.2.X and 2.4.X for modules

From: Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk)
Date: Sun Jul 02 2000 - 03:07:32 EST

Next message: Russell King: "Re: console_lock too early in printk???"
Previous message: Dietmar Schnabel: "Re: Problem (only on Linux) with SCSI Disk after installation of Windows 2000"
Next in thread: Zdenek Kabelac: "Re: spinlocks() are severely broken in 2.2.X and 2.4.X for modules"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Manfred Spraul writes:
> Is it possible to detect the problem automatically until binutils is
> fixed? (objdump + script)

Yes. If (binutils_version < 2.9.4) complain to kernel hacker to upgrade
binutils.
   _____
  |_____| ------------------------------------------------- ---+---+-
  | | Russell King rmk@arm.linux.org.uk --- ---
  | | | | http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/~rmk/aboutme.html / / |
  | +-+-+ --- -+-
  / | THE developer of ARM Linux |+| /|\
/ | | | --- |
    +-+-+ ------------------------------------------------- /\\\ |

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Russell King: "Re: console_lock too early in printk???"
Previous message: Dietmar Schnabel: "Re: Problem (only on Linux) with SCSI Disk after installation of Windows 2000"
Next in thread: Zdenek Kabelac: "Re: spinlocks() are severely broken in 2.2.X and 2.4.X for modules"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jul 07 2000 - 21:00:10 EST