Re: [RFC] procfs has run out of inode numbers

• Next message: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: OOM?"
• Previous message: Matthew Dharm: "DAC960 and test2-ac2"
• In reply to: Manfred Spraul: "[RFC] procfs has run out of inode numbers"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Followup to: <3957ABA6.C89CE8D1@colorfullife.com>
By author: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> AFAICS we can either
> * hash all entries in proc, and use iunique.
> * return duplicate inode numbers. It only affects the /proc/<pid> part
> of procfs, but perhaps some apps rely on unique inode numbers.
>
> I'd prefer the second option, but which apps will break?
>

The second option would also make it very easy to MIB-ify /proc/sys.
That way we would use the inode field to report the MIB numbers. It
would be very clean: "ls -li" could be used to get the numeric
equivalents.

        -hpa

-- 
<hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: OOM?"
• Previous message: Matthew Dharm: "DAC960 and test2-ac2"
• In reply to: Manfred Spraul: "[RFC] procfs has run out of inode numbers"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jun 26 2000 - 21:00:10 EST