Re: OOM?

From: Andrea Arcangeli (andrea@suse.de)
Date: Mon Jun 26 2000 - 17:56:14 EST

Next message: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: Database server slowdown with "buff" ~= physical memory"
Previous message: Jeff Garzik: "Re: Framebuffer/console modules?"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: OOM?"
Next in thread: Adam Heath: "Re: OOM?"
Reply: Adam Heath: "Re: OOM?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, 26 Jun 2000, Alan Cox wrote:

>It doesnt crash the kernel unless init dies

init can't die in latest 2.2.x kernels.

Andrea

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: Database server slowdown with "buff" ~= physical memory"
Previous message: Jeff Garzik: "Re: Framebuffer/console modules?"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: OOM?"
Next in thread: Adam Heath: "Re: OOM?"
Reply: Adam Heath: "Re: OOM?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jun 26 2000 - 21:00:10 EST