Re: [question] why not get rid of handle_softirq from schedule()?

From: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru
Date: Mon Jun 26 2000 - 13:27:40 EST

Next message: Manfred Spraul: "Re: [question] why not get rid of handle_softirq from schedule()?"
Previous message: Leisheng Ji: "How to deal with this?"
In reply to: Tigran Aivazian: "Re: [question] why not get rid of handle_softirq from schedule()?"
Next in thread: Manfred Spraul: "Re: [question] why not get rid of handle_softirq from schedule()?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hello!

> so, would you agree that a) and b) are redundant because c) should occur
> sufficiently often (e.g. timer)?

Timer is not sufficiently often. At all. Actually, from
the viewpoint of network heartbeat, one timer tick is period
sort of millenium. 8)

Alexey

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Manfred Spraul: "Re: [question] why not get rid of handle_softirq from schedule()?"
Previous message: Leisheng Ji: "How to deal with this?"
In reply to: Tigran Aivazian: "Re: [question] why not get rid of handle_softirq from schedule()?"
Next in thread: Manfred Spraul: "Re: [question] why not get rid of handle_softirq from schedule()?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jun 26 2000 - 21:00:09 EST