Re: [PATCH] Compile fixes for 2.4.0-test2

From: Alex Buell (alex.buell@tahallah.clara.co.uk)
Date: Sun Jun 25 2000 - 03:43:32 EST

Next message: Manfred Spraul: "get_pid() question"
Previous message: Alexander Viro: "Re: IMMUTABLE and APPEND-ONLY rationales"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] Compile fixes for 2.4.0-test2"
Next in thread: Chris Wedgwood: "Re: [PATCH] Compile fixes for 2.4.0-test2"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sat, 24 Jun 2000, Alan Cox wrote:

> its nothing to do with ansi compliance. gcc 2.95 is a bit more
> flexible about some gnu extensions. The fact 2.7.2 doesnt work with
> test2 is just a bug, its one of those you never catch until someone
> using 2.7.2 builds the tree, then you hear loudly about it 8)

Hmm.

I think I'll dig out the tarballs of gcc 2.7.2.3, egcs 1.0.3a, and egcs
1.1.2 and run compilation tests on 2.4.0-test2. Thankfully I have another
box for testing.

Any other compilers to add to the list?

Cheers,
Alex

-- If you see someone without a smile, give them one of yours!

http://www.tahallah.clara.co.uk

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Manfred Spraul: "get_pid() question"
Previous message: Alexander Viro: "Re: IMMUTABLE and APPEND-ONLY rationales"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] Compile fixes for 2.4.0-test2"
Next in thread: Chris Wedgwood: "Re: [PATCH] Compile fixes for 2.4.0-test2"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jun 26 2000 - 21:00:06 EST