RE: IMMUTABLE and APPEND-ONLY rationales

From: Igmar Palsenberg (maillist@chello.nl)
Date: Sat Jun 24 2000 - 21:34:53 EST


> > From: ak@suse.de [mailto:ak@suse.de]
> > Even root cannot delete immutable and append-only files again. So if every
> > user was allowed to do that he/she could create a lot of problems for root
> > (like creating undeletable files in /tmp)
> ---
>
> Root is already privileged to set/unset those bits on any file regardless
> of ownership. It does not follow that this would change if users could
> set those bits on their own files.

That means I have to use an extra command. I'm a student, and I'm lazy. If
users want to protect their files : chmod 600 does the trick, and with a
600 dir you'r safe.
 
> I'm sorry, but I don't see that as a valid rationale.

It doesn't make sense for normal users to have immutable / append only
privs.
 
> --
> Linda A Walsh | Trust Technology, Core Linux, SGI
> law@sgi.com | Voice: (650) 933-5338

        Igmar

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jun 26 2000 - 21:00:06 EST