Adam Sampson wrote:
> Also, what's the official stance on what headers should be in
> /usr/include/linux? The glibc 2.1.3 documentation says that
> /usr/include/linux and usr/include/asm should be symlinks into the source
> tree, but this hasn't been true for a long time now. Where should we get
> the "new" headers from?
>
How long has it not been true? I've never heard anything like that.
I'm running test1, with glibc-2.1.3, and mine are links:
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 32 Apr 21 00:15 /usr/include/asm
-> /usr/src/linux/include/asm-i386/
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 26 Apr 21 00:15
/usr/include/linux -> ../src/linux/include/linux/
If yours aren't links, then you've got something misconfigured.
-- Matthew Vanecek Visit my Website at http://mysite.directlink.net/linuxguy For answers type: perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5,(41*2),sqrt(7056),(unpack(c,H)-2),oct(115),10);' ***************************************************************** For 93 million miles, there is nothing between the sun and my shadow except me. I'm always getting in the way of something...- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jun 26 2000 - 21:00:05 EST