Re: VM performance 2.2.x vs 2.4.0test-ac

From: Kjartan Maraas (kmaraas@online.no)
Date: Sat Jun 24 2000 - 13:27:41 EST


Kjartan Maraas wrote:
>
> I have a perl script that is used to update the i18n status
> table for the GNOME project. Running the script gives the
> following information:
>
> 2.4.0pre1-ac18:
>
> 5431.53user 12.76system 1:35:58elapsed 94%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata
> 0maxresident)k
> 0inputs+0outputs (268732major+222801minor)pagefaults 0swaps
>
> 2nd run:
>
> 5884.41user 12.94system 1:41:02elapsed 97%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata
> 0maxresident)k
> 0inputs+0outputs (268755major+221548minor)pagefaults 0swaps
> [kmaraas@km-lt ru]$
>
> 2.2.14-rh:
>
> 1156.70user 12.49system 22:07.45elapsed 88%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata
> 0maxresident)k0inputs+0outputs (311567major+217502minor)pagefaults
> 0swaps
>
2.4.0-test2:

1245.01user 14.11system 24:57elapsed 84%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata
0maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (357356major+240118minor)pagefaults 0swaps

This is almost as good as the 2.2.14 kernel from Red Hat Linux 6.2
and if I read Rik van Riel's posting right, most of the VM fixes are
still
pending in 2.4.0? Looks promising :)

Cheers
Kjartan Maraas

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jun 26 2000 - 21:00:05 EST