Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > >To fix this, I followed (almost) the same technique as inodes_stat in
> > >fs/inode.c, i.e. gathered variables in a structure called files_stat.
> > >
> > >Tested under 2.3.99-pre10-3 (aka 2.4.0-test1)
> >
> > Now, tested under 2.4.0-test2.
>
> I havent submitted that to Linus. As someone pointed out the guarantee is
> not true for a struct either..
>
> If anything you need to use an array.
>
Are you saying that:
struct foo
{
int x;
int y;
} bar;
((int *)&bar + 1) != &bar.y
can sometimes be true?
Rui Sousa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jun 26 2000 - 21:00:04 EST