f5ibh wrote:
>
> Hi Erik, Alex, Greg,
>
> >You must repent by saying 10 "Our Penguins" and 5 "Hail Tux"es.
> >It compiles just fine for me. This is what I see at that point:
>
> I will repent .. I will .. when I will have (or when _you_ will have) find
> where is the problem.
--- linux-official/kernel/sched.c Thu Jun 22 20:45:36 2000
+++ linux-akpm/kernel/sched.c Fri Jun 23 22:01:03 2000
@@ -60,8 +60,8 @@
* The run-queue lock locks the parts that actually access
* and change the run-queues, and have to be interrupt-safe.
*/
-__cacheline_aligned spinlock_t runqueue_lock = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED; /* second */
-__cacheline_aligned rwlock_t tasklist_lock = RW_LOCK_UNLOCKED; /* third */
+spinlock_t runqueue_lock __cacheline_aligned = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED; /* second */
+rwlock_t tasklist_lock __cacheline_aligned = RW_LOCK_UNLOCKED; /* third */
static LIST_HEAD(runqueue_head);
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jun 26 2000 - 21:00:04 EST