On Thu, 15 Jun 2000, Kees Bakker wrote:
> With test1-ac17 I still have very bad performance, because kswapd eats
> almost all of the CPU cycles. The bare test1 was a little better, but not
> much.
Hmm, plain test1 gives MUCH (>100%) better performance here (128mb.. not
tested under ram-impoverished config) Have you tried 99-pre5 on this box?..
pre5 was the last kernel which gave me nice all-around (vm) preformance.
-Mike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jun 15 2000 - 21:00:36 EST