Re: BUG() hit with ramfs usage (v 2.4.0test1-ac18)

• Next message: Jesse Pollard: "RE: Ke: Process Capabilities on 2.2.16, Sendmail problem revisited"
• Previous message: Juan J. Quintela: "Re: BUG() hit with ramfs usage (v 2.4.0test1-ac18)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

>>>>> "wollny" == wollny <wollny@cns.mpg.de> writes:

wollny> Hi,
wollny> playing a bit with ramfs i hit a BUG() statement in page_alloc.c:97 since
wollny> the "PageDirty" test is true.

wollny> the following commands lead to this:

>>>
wollny> mount -t ramfs ramfs /mnt
wollny> cd /mnt
wollny> echo "Hello" >test
wollny> echo "Hello" >test
wollny> <<

Could you test my patch that I send to the list last night???
It is also in:
   http://carpanta.dc.fi.udc.es/~quintela/kernel/2.4.0-test1-ac19

(It should patch against any recent ac kernel.

Thanks for the report and the test to reproduce it.

Later, Juan.

-- 
In theory, practice and theory are the same, but in practice they 
are different -- Larry McVoy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Jesse Pollard: "RE: Ke: Process Capabilities on 2.2.16, Sendmail problem revisited"
• Previous message: Juan J. Quintela: "Re: BUG() hit with ramfs usage (v 2.4.0test1-ac18)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jun 15 2000 - 21:00:35 EST