>NTFS write support has been in development kernels long
>enough to have earned it a place in the stable kernels as well: Reiser's
>code has not.
This argument looks bad to me - let the code spend some time
in a dev kernel, and then it is ready wheter it works or not?
Writeable NTFS is known broken, but it is still there with
a "dangerous" label.
The latest reiserfs isn't tested that much, but at least there
are people using it in production systems. I haven't heard
about anybody using writeable NTFS for production. Seems to
me that including reiserfs is possible, put it under
"experimental" or even "dangerous" and remove the label
once there's enough testing.
helge Hafting
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jun 15 2000 - 21:00:34 EST