Re: It's time to get rid of zImage

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Wed Jun 14 2000 - 16:57:39 EST

Next message: Brad Douglas: "RE: Rage Pro LT Meltdown with Mach 64 framebuffer driver"
Previous message: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: Stability (2.2.14/15/16/17pre1)"
In reply to: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: It's time to get rid of zImage"
Next in thread: Johannes Erdfelt: "Re: It's time to get rid of zImage"
Reply: Johannes Erdfelt: "Re: It's time to get rid of zImage"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> It's different for IA64. I don't expect to see it on 32-bit machines
> any time soon, and it is going to be *eons* until it is ubiquitous.

IA64 runs IA32 apps and most apps wont need to be 64bit. I think *eons* may
be an underestimate. Also EFI isnt going to happen for existing machines.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Brad Douglas: "RE: Rage Pro LT Meltdown with Mach 64 framebuffer driver"
Previous message: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: Stability (2.2.14/15/16/17pre1)"
In reply to: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: It's time to get rid of zImage"
Next in thread: Johannes Erdfelt: "Re: It's time to get rid of zImage"
Reply: Johannes Erdfelt: "Re: It's time to get rid of zImage"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jun 15 2000 - 21:00:33 EST