Re: It's time to get rid of zImage

From: Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH (allbery@kf8nh.apk.net)
Date: Tue Jun 13 2000 - 15:54:54 EST

Next message: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: Stability (2.2.14/15/16/17pre1)"
Previous message: Khimenko Victor: "Re: 2.4 setproctitle breakage (was reiserfs marathon thread)"
In reply to: H. Peter Anvin: "It's time to get rid of zImage"
Next in thread: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: It's time to get rid of zImage"
Reply: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: It's time to get rid of zImage"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 06/13/00 18:27:13 -0700 "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@transmeta.com> wrote:
+-----
| So, given that, does anyone see any reason at all to support zImage
| kernels anymore?
+--->8

Have the problems with bzImages not loading on some systems been resolved?

-- brandon s. allbery os/2,linux,solaris,perl allbery@kf8nh.apk.net system administrator kthkrb,heimdal,gnome,rt,cyrus allbery@ece.cmu.edu carnegie mellon / electrical and computer engineering kf8nh We are Linux. Resistance is an indication that you missed the point.

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: Stability (2.2.14/15/16/17pre1)"
Previous message: Khimenko Victor: "Re: 2.4 setproctitle breakage (was reiserfs marathon thread)"
In reply to: H. Peter Anvin: "It's time to get rid of zImage"
Next in thread: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: It's time to get rid of zImage"
Reply: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: It's time to get rid of zImage"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jun 15 2000 - 21:00:29 EST