On Tue, Jun 13, 2000 at 05:43:35PM +0400, Ivan Kokshaysky wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 13, 2000 at 07:17:48AM -0600, Philipp Rumpf wrote:
> > That's an unaligned access. What actually probably happens is there is
> > padding between .processor and .ptrace. While this isn't news
> > (last_processor is an int between two pointers), we probably shouldn't
> > rely on the compiler padding structs in assembly.
>
> No, it's aligned properly. 104=8*13.
> So no padding between int processor and ulong ptrace.
> >
> > So changing TASK_PTRACE to be 108 seems to be the easiest fix for now.
> >
> BTW, I was confused for a moment by these numbers too, but then
> I realized that they are decimal, not hex :-)
Nod, that's what got me.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jun 15 2000 - 21:00:28 EST