Re: (reiserfs) Re: Red Hat (was Re: reiserfs)

From: Stephen C. Tweedie (sct@redhat.com)
Date: Mon Jun 12 2000 - 10:12:49 EST


Hi,

On Mon, Jun 12, 2000 at 04:57:50PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:

> there are a lot commercial software "for redhat" not "for linux", i even
> found device drivers supplied as .rpm with kernel modules - of course for
> redhat.

And there is stuff packaged as Debian packages instead. No big deal ---
the whole advantage of open source is that you can take stuff built
for one distribution and run it on another if you want. The most
important thing is that the actual standards in Linux are defined more
by glibc, gcc, the kernel APIs and the LSB than by any vendor, and
those components are all pretty much standard across all distributions
(the LSB isn't quite universal yet, but things are improving there too).

--Stephen

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jun 15 2000 - 21:00:25 EST