Re: Nice work!

From: Hans-Joachim Baader (hans@grumbeer.inka.de)
Date: Sun Jun 11 2000 - 15:08:11 EST

Next message: Chris Wedgwood: "Re: web server (and TCP) performance tuning?"
Previous message: David Marshall: "Re: sda misreported as hda"
In reply to: Steven N. Hirsch: "Nice work!"
Next in thread: Steven N. Hirsch: "Re: Nice work!"
Reply: Steven N. Hirsch: "Re: Nice work!"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

In article <Pine.LNX.4.10.10006110015130.1513-100000@pii.fast.net> you write:
>Very impressive.

And to get realistic numbers, use a file size of 3 or 4 times the
memory size ;-)

Anyway, IMO SCSI systems are much more responsive than IDE systems
under load even if the IDE disks seem to be faster. In reality,
SCSI is faster (and less braindamaged).

hjb

-- http://www.pro-linux.de/ - Germany's largest volunteer Linux support site

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Chris Wedgwood: "Re: web server (and TCP) performance tuning?"
Previous message: David Marshall: "Re: sda misreported as hda"
In reply to: Steven N. Hirsch: "Nice work!"
Next in thread: Steven N. Hirsch: "Re: Nice work!"
Reply: Steven N. Hirsch: "Re: Nice work!"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jun 15 2000 - 21:00:24 EST