Re: [PATCH] Updates to FXSR/SSE support in 2.4.0-test1

From: Gareth Hughes (gareth@precisioninsight.com)
Date: Sun Jun 11 2000 - 12:15:12 EST


Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > What happens when a signal occurs in a time slice where the application
> > hasn't used the FPU? Having the regular FPU environment around means we
>
> You touch the FPU, it loads the FPU state you save both. If the FPU state
> is already loaded it costs nothing. The FNSAVE stuff is horribly slow so
> it is a real concern.

I'm not sure I understand what you're advocating here. If you're okay
with converting the FXSAVE data back and forth, then so am I.

> > I'll play around with the conversion into/out of the signal handler and
> > GETFPREGS request. Should only take a short while, so don't do anything
> > with the stuff I sent out yesterday.
>
> Right now its correct, this is about being correct clean and fast so we are
> going the right way

I certainly agree with making it clean and fast, as well as correct.
Would you prefer the conversion and just using FXSAVE/FXRSTOR?

-- Gareth

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jun 15 2000 - 21:00:22 EST