Re: shm fs mount

From: Tigran Aivazian (tigran@veritas.com)
Date: Fri Jun 09 2000 - 10:22:21 EST


On 9 Jun 2000, Christoph Rohland wrote:

> Tigran Aivazian <tigran@veritas.com> writes:
> > didn't Peter Anvin say recently that the reason the internal mount
> > instance of shmfs is mounted on "/" is todo with POSIX IPC
> > requirements that any object should correspond to a "real pathname"?
>
> No, to use POSIX shm you have to mount it into the real tree.
>

Cool. How about procfs being currently mounted on "/" - can this also be
fixed to become "proc:"?

Regards,
Tigran

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jun 15 2000 - 21:00:19 EST