Re: linux and micro kernel

From: Khimenko Victor (khim@sch57.msk.ru)
Date: Fri Jun 09 2000 - 07:42:41 EST


In <20000609142023.A2191@burza.icm.edu.pl> Rafal Maszkowski (rzm@icm.edu.pl) wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 09, 2000 at 07:41:26AM -0400, Johan Kullstam wrote:
>> Tonglu Yi <tlyi@fm365.com> writes:
>> > linux is not micro kernel based OS, would it change to that in the
>> > future?
>> never say never, but the chances of this happening are slim and none.
>> especially since linux has automatic loading and unloading of kernel
>> modules, the advantages of microkernel are few.

> I think some Macintosh version is microkernel based.

No, no. It's not micokernel based. It's done this way: there are mach micro
kernel on low level and this micro kernel has EXACTLY one process running:
slightly modified linux kernel. So basically it just slow down everything
and make kernel bigger (why it was done at all then? it simplified porting :-)

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jun 15 2000 - 21:00:18 EST