It's far to small for logging, but perhaps for status flags on a particular
transaction? as long as all journaling fs-s keep to a standard.
Might make it easier to keep track of transaction statuses? Well, that is a
solved problem anyways, AFAIK :-) But it might still help? :-)
--Tim
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 09, 2000 at 12:45:51PM +0200, Xuan Baldauf wrote:
>
> Is it reasonable to use the 50 bytes of /dev/nvram for logging or is it
just
> too small?
Far, far, far, far, far too small. You need tens of kB minimum to record
a single filesystem transaction for a complex operation such as a file
delete.
Cheers,
Stephen
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jun 15 2000 - 21:00:18 EST