On Fri, 9 Jun 2000, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> "Ph. Marek" wrote:
> >
> > Hi everybody,
> >
> > there have recently been some discussions about /proc reorganization - which stopped abruptly. I didn't quite get the latest status - is it deferred, are we waiting for some example coding or whatever???
Heh. Stopped abruptly == everyone had time to talk about the grand new
schemes, but nobody had time/desire to address the real problem:
> Someone needs to do a complete review of all proc code in the kernel,
> and post a document describing the namespace currently in use. That's a
> big first step which must occur before any reorg.
Yup, that one.
> It's a task which has been languishing on my own todo list for quite a
> while, and its looking like 2.5 work unless someone beats me to it.
And it starts smelling like providing small static trees from drivers may
be the way to handle this stuff...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jun 15 2000 - 21:00:17 EST