Re: 'sign' modules? was: RE: 'lock' modules?

From: Keith Owens (kaos@ocs.com.au)
Date: Wed Jun 07 2000 - 02:30:33 EST


On Wed, 7 Jun 2000 01:04:12 -0600 ,
ronbarry@es.com wrote:
>Anyway, what if we were to institute a system where a kernel module could be
>digitally signed by assorted authorities as 'blessed?'

Sigh. Why do people keep bring up this topic without reading the
archives first? This has been discussed and rejected before but one
more time ....

Module loading is handled by user space utilities, not the kernel. To
bypass signed modules a hacker can use their own user space code,
either a butchered version of insmod or they just invoke the module
syscalls directly from their own programs.

Once more with feeling - "root can do anything that root is allowed to
do". First design a mechanism to distinguish between a good and a bad
root user, when you have working code send it to the list.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jun 07 2000 - 21:00:27 EST