Re: 8139too status (was Re: confirmation on 8139)

• Next message: Marc Mutz: "Re: Dumb question for off-list discussion -- WAS: ULTRA ATA/100 announced"
• Previous message: Hans Reiser: "Re: (reiserfs) Re: New Linux 2.5 - 2.6 TODO (Alan Cox suggests delaying reiserfs integration)"
• In reply to: Jeff Garzik: "8139too status (was Re: confirmation on 8139)"
• Next in thread: Nils Philippsen: "Re: 8139too status (was Re: confirmation on 8139)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Jeff Garzik wrote:

> David Ford wrote:
> >
> > This is confirmation that the 8139too in 2.40-test1-ac9 is functioning.
>
> The "bridging bug" is fixed but there still remains a bug (fixed in next
> version) which kills the older RTL8139 chipsets. Look for the fix in
> ac10 or ac11...

That's good. Prior to this check, my 8139 wouldn't work period.

-d

--
"The difference between 'involvement' and 'commitment' is like an
eggs-and-ham breakfast: the chicken was 'involved' - the pig was
'committed'."
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Marc Mutz: "Re: Dumb question for off-list discussion -- WAS: ULTRA ATA/100 announced"
• Previous message: Hans Reiser: "Re: (reiserfs) Re: New Linux 2.5 - 2.6 TODO (Alan Cox suggests delaying reiserfs integration)"
• In reply to: Jeff Garzik: "8139too status (was Re: confirmation on 8139)"
• Next in thread: Nils Philippsen: "Re: 8139too status (was Re: confirmation on 8139)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jun 07 2000 - 21:00:26 EST