On Mon, 5 Jun 2000, Stephen Frost wrote:
> Each has it's uses. Each has capabilities the other does not
THANK YOU!
This is not to turn into an ATA-SCSI pissing contest!
I got the attention of media to show that Linux is a leader in technology
and can be proactive in the devlopment.
Sheesh, I busted my ass all night to shake things down to be ready for the
announcement......do you think it was an accident that I had a patch
sitting around waiting for the press release?
> (ATA/100, if nothing else, is likely cheaper :) ). There is little
> point in argueing over it for what may or may not be good is totally
> deterministic on the situation. Perhaps some ATA spec in the future
> will out-do SCSI in all aspects, but I find it unlikely. If it does,
> though, will it still be cheaper? :) We shall see, for my crystal
> ball is foggy now and I am not able to foretell the future currently.
Mine is clear and defining the future!
Andre Hedrick
The Linux ATA/IDE guy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jun 07 2000 - 21:00:23 EST