On 2000-06-05T13:26:54,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> said:
> Rik is probably right. One thing we try very hard to do is to ensure you can
> always go backwards. 2.2.15 for example does nothing to your box that means
> you cannot go back to 2.2.0.
I don't disagree here. 2.4.x and 2.4.y should always have compatible disk
formats - barring real hard bugs - for any x or y.
However, as long as that is warranted, I don't see any problem with 2.x having
a different disk format than 2.y. (As long as such is clearly advertised)
Sincerely,
Lars Marowsky-Brée <lmb@suse.de>
Development HA
-- Perfection is our goal, excellence will be tolerated. -- J. Yahl- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jun 07 2000 - 21:00:21 EST