Re: [PATCH] (#2) VM kswapd autotuning vs. -ac7

• Next message: Michael Riepe: "Re: Loopback (dir->dir) mounting (NOT -o loop)"
• Previous message: Larry Colen - Open Source Group: "Hardware selection (probably a faq)"
• Maybe in reply to: Rik van Riel: "[PATCH] (#2) VM kswapd autotuning vs. -ac7"
• Next in thread: bert hubert: "Re: [PATCH] (#2) VM kswapd autotuning vs. -ac7"
• Reply: bert hubert: "Re: [PATCH] (#2) VM kswapd autotuning vs. -ac7"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi Rik,

I'm afraid there's something quite buggy in this second patch. When
booting with this patch, performance started out as "OK, much better
than -ac7 plain and perhaps also better than the previous patch, we're
getting there, but not as impressive as pre9 yet".

Then, when overloading the memory a bit using Mozilla and Netscape at
the same time, I noticed that performance started degrading to the
point of unusable.

And then I looked at top, and saw that it report NO SWAP USED!

I'm looking forward to version 3 though!

--Tim

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Michael Riepe: "Re: Loopback (dir->dir) mounting (NOT -o loop)"
• Previous message: Larry Colen - Open Source Group: "Hardware selection (probably a faq)"
• Maybe in reply to: Rik van Riel: "[PATCH] (#2) VM kswapd autotuning vs. -ac7"
• Next in thread: bert hubert: "Re: [PATCH] (#2) VM kswapd autotuning vs. -ac7"
• Reply: bert hubert: "Re: [PATCH] (#2) VM kswapd autotuning vs. -ac7"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jun 07 2000 - 21:00:16 EST