Re: %eax %ax 2.2.15

From: Alan Modra (alan@linuxcare.com.au)
Date: Thu Jun 01 2000 - 19:25:21 EST

Next message: Riley Williams: "Re: Slow development cycle"
Previous message: Andries Brouwer: "Re: Wierd problem with mount, labels and 2.3.99-pre9+"
In reply to: Brian Gerst: "Re: %eax %ax 2.2.15"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: %eax %ax 2.2.15"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: %eax %ax 2.2.15"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, 1 Jun 2000, Brian Gerst wrote:

> > Warnings are as follows:
> > {standard input}: Assembler messages:
> > {standard input}:1148: Warning: using `%eax' instead of `%ax' due to
> > `l' suffix
> > Is this bad and how bad????
>
> The warnings are harmless.

Correct.

> Upgrade binutils to get rid of them.

Wrong. The warnings are a feature of new binutils.

-- Linuxcare. Support for the Revolution.

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Riley Williams: "Re: Slow development cycle"
Previous message: Andries Brouwer: "Re: Wierd problem with mount, labels and 2.3.99-pre9+"
In reply to: Brian Gerst: "Re: %eax %ax 2.2.15"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: %eax %ax 2.2.15"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: %eax %ax 2.2.15"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jun 07 2000 - 21:00:13 EST