Re: Does /var/shm still need to be mounted?

From: David Howells (David.Howells@nexor.co.uk)
Date: Thu Jun 01 2000 - 03:05:17 EST


> Thomas Molina writes:
>
> > 1. Why is /var/shm such a bad place?
...
> It really doesn't. It belongs in /dev more than anything, just like
> /dev/pts and friends.

Why not mount it under /proc somewhere? Maybe /proc/shm.

David Howells

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jun 07 2000 - 21:00:11 EST