Re: %eax %ax 2.2.15

From: Alan Modra (alan@linuxcare.com.au)
Date: Thu Jun 01 2000 - 01:46:03 EST

Next message: CaT: "Re: root not busy as it should? [was Re: 2.4.0test1-ac4 - mount problem]"
Previous message: Ragnar Kjørstad: "Re: root not busy as it should? [was Re: 2.4.0test1-ac4 - mount problem]"
In reply to: Joe: "%eax %ax 2.2.15"
Next in thread: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz: "Re: %eax %ax 2.2.15"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, 30 May 2000, Joe wrote:

> I just compiled 2.2.15 SMP and it spit out all these warning messages.
>[snip]
> {standard input}: Assembler messages:
> {standard input}:1148: Warning: using `%eax' instead of `%ax' due to `l'
> suffix
>[snip]
> Is this bad and how bad????

It's bad to not check the archives when you think you have a problem.
It's bad to post reams of the same duplicated warning message.
It's even worse to post your message **three** times.

-- Linuxcare. Support for the Revolution.

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: CaT: "Re: root not busy as it should? [was Re: 2.4.0test1-ac4 - mount problem]"
Previous message: Ragnar Kjørstad: "Re: root not busy as it should? [was Re: 2.4.0test1-ac4 - mount problem]"
In reply to: Joe: "%eax %ax 2.2.15"
Next in thread: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz: "Re: %eax %ax 2.2.15"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jun 07 2000 - 21:00:11 EST