Re: unix socket & fcntl => kernel oops ?

From: Chris Wedgwood (cw@f00f.org)
Date: Tue May 30 2000 - 17:14:39 EST

Next message: Alan Cox: "Linux 2.4.0test1-ac6"
Previous message: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: No! (was: Re: Does /var/shm still need to be mounted?)"
In reply to: Alexander Viro: "Re: unix socket & fcntl => kernel oops ?"
Next in thread: Miquel van Smoorenburg: "Re: unix socket & fcntl => kernel oops ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

WTF? open() _does_ fail on them. Victor, care to resend the oops?
Sorry, missed it on l-k...

eh?

bind(4, {sin_family=AF_UNIX, path="/tmp/.s.PGSQL.5432"}, 20) = 0
open("/tmp/.s.PGSQL.5432", O_WRONLY|O_NONBLOCK) = 5

--cw

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alan Cox: "Linux 2.4.0test1-ac6"
Previous message: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: No! (was: Re: Does /var/shm still need to be mounted?)"
In reply to: Alexander Viro: "Re: unix socket & fcntl => kernel oops ?"
Next in thread: Miquel van Smoorenburg: "Re: unix socket & fcntl => kernel oops ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 31 2000 - 21:00:25 EST