Re: [KBUILD] Re: Announcing CML2, a replacement for the kbuild system

From: Ed Carp (erc@pobox.com)
Date: Tue May 30 2000 - 00:12:56 EST


Marek Habersack (grendel@vip.net.pl) writes:

> ** On May 27, Ed Carp scribbled:
> > George (greerga@nidhogg.ham.muohio.edu) writes:
> >=20
> > > Since when do you link your kernel with Xlib?
> >=20
> > Oh, I see your point. No, if Xlib is linked with any utilities I try to
> > provide with the kernel, I have to include Xlib as well, and it's not fea=
> sible
> > to do tha on a floppy-based router.
> Geez, man! How in a world would you like to compile a 90MB source tree on a
> floppy router?? First show us a way to do that, then moan about Xlib.

Oh, *please*. You don't *develop* on a floppy-based system...but you have to
include Xlib with your executables.

Are you being deliberately dense, or is it that you don't understand how
dynamic libraries work?

--
Ed Carp, N7EKG  	erc@pobox.com		940/367-2744 cell phone
			http://www.pobox.com/~erc

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 31 2000 - 21:00:23 EST