Re: UnixWare versus Linux, and 2.4 i686 PAE mode

From: Paul Jakma (paul@clubi.ie)
Date: Sun May 28 2000 - 19:19:05 EST

Next message: Rik van Riel: "Re: Slow development cycle"
Previous message: Jesse Pollard: "Re: Slow development cycle"
In reply to: Mark Hahn: "Re: UnixWare versus Linux, and 2.4 i686 PAE mode"
Next in thread: Warren Young: "Re: UnixWare versus Linux, and 2.4 i686 PAE mode"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sun, 28 May 2000, Mark Hahn wrote:

> .... these articles are mostly SCO self-congratulation.

Perhaps SCO's suits may have said a few inflammatory things once or
twice, But make no mistake, UnixWare 7 is quite nice, esp in /big/
configurations.

regards,

-- Paul Jakma paul@clubi.ie PGP5 key: http://www.clubi.ie/jakma/publickey.txt ------------------------------------------- Fortune: The universe does not have laws -- it has habits, and habits can be broken.

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Rik van Riel: "Re: Slow development cycle"
Previous message: Jesse Pollard: "Re: Slow development cycle"
In reply to: Mark Hahn: "Re: UnixWare versus Linux, and 2.4 i686 PAE mode"
Next in thread: Warren Young: "Re: UnixWare versus Linux, and 2.4 i686 PAE mode"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 31 2000 - 21:00:20 EST