Re: UnixWare versus Linux, and 2.4 i686 PAE mode

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Sun May 28 2000 - 14:41:33 EST

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: mmap beyond file end (2.4.0-test1 with Reiserfs 3.6.6)"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: UnixWare versus Linux, and 2.4 i686 PAE mode"
In reply to: Christoph Rohland: "Re: UnixWare versus Linux, and 2.4 i686 PAE mode"
Next in thread: Mark Hahn: "Re: UnixWare versus Linux, and 2.4 i686 PAE mode"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> Of course a single-process can use more than 3GB of memory by using
> shared memory and mapping and unmapping parts of the memory as
> needed. This is what SAP R/3 will do on Linux 2.4.

So you in fact implemented Unixware dshm in user space ?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: mmap beyond file end (2.4.0-test1 with Reiserfs 3.6.6)"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: UnixWare versus Linux, and 2.4 i686 PAE mode"
In reply to: Christoph Rohland: "Re: UnixWare versus Linux, and 2.4 i686 PAE mode"
Next in thread: Mark Hahn: "Re: UnixWare versus Linux, and 2.4 i686 PAE mode"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 31 2000 - 21:00:19 EST