Re: Actual environment size comparison of CML1 and CML2

From: Igmar Palsenberg (maillist@chello.nl)
Date: Sat May 27 2000 - 16:02:21 EST


> I mean what I said, but now I'm wondering what kitchen sinks got
> thrown in the RPMs to make my installation that big. I presume your
> 1328 installed size is in kilobytes? Then we might be looking at a
> 2.7M advantage for Perl -- but I gotta wonder if that base package
> includes stuff like DataDumper or Tcl/TK which CML-2-in-Perl would
> actually need.

Well, a rpm -ql perl will probably tell you. Moast bloat is the module,
and the header files.

Best way is rpm -e perl and start using python or so in that case.

        Igmar

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 31 2000 - 21:00:18 EST