Re: [PATCH] 3 performance tweaks

From: Manfred Spraul (manfreds@colorfullife.com)
Date: Thu May 25 2000 - 12:15:08 EST

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: 2.3.99pre8 shows no shared memory."
Previous message: Hans Reiser: "Re: Proposal: int (permission*)(struct dentry *, int)"
In reply to: kumon@flab.fujitsu.co.jp: "Re: [PATCH] 3 performance tweaks"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] 3 performance tweaks"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] 3 performance tweaks"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

kumon@flab.fujitsu.co.jp wrote:
>
> Though it works well, I found a flaw which nullify CPU cache
> effectiveness.
>
Is there a way to measure the cache trashing, perhaps with some of the
CPU performance counters?

-- Manfred

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: 2.3.99pre8 shows no shared memory."
Previous message: Hans Reiser: "Re: Proposal: int (permission*)(struct dentry *, int)"
In reply to: kumon@flab.fujitsu.co.jp: "Re: [PATCH] 3 performance tweaks"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] 3 performance tweaks"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] 3 performance tweaks"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 31 2000 - 21:00:14 EST