Re: Announcing CML2, a replacement for the kbuild system

From: Ed Carp (erc@pobox.com)
Date: Wed May 24 2000 - 18:05:18 EST


Alexander Viro (viro@math.psu.edu) writes:

> Al, -><- close to getting PO'd enough to actually implement One
> True Editor as ldisc - insmod vi.o and there we go...

I think we ought to be celebrating the fact that we *have* more than one editor
to choose from, instead of fighting over which is the One True Editor, an
argument which is foolish on its face. My office mate uses Emacs, he loves
it, and more power to him. I use vi. I'm just glad that I'm not forced to
use Emacs, and he's not forced to use vi, and that's what this whole thing
is all about, isn't it?

--
Ed Carp, N7EKG  	erc@pobox.com		940/367-2744 cell phone
			http://www.pobox.com/~erc

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 31 2000 - 21:00:12 EST