On Tue, May 23, 2000 at 04:59:02PM +0200, Markus Pfeiffer wrote:
> to my comment. As I read about people who want more and more features in
> 2.4 because its sooooo necessary for companies or even other issues I
> get really angry. One, namely Linus can once stabilize the features,
> bring out 2.4 and then happily go on to 2.5. The story goes on, and if
> the dev-cycle becomes shorter then, new features will be in new kernels
Hi Markus,
I dont think this has anything to do with companies wanting features.
Every stable kernel release has come out MUCH latter than people wanted
it to. This one is going about like all the other ones did :-)
Jim
PS Anybody remember how many "1.0 by Christmas" years we had?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 23 2000 - 21:00:24 EST