Re: RFC: kernel changelogs (semi-long)

From: Jeff Garzik (jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com)
Date: Tue May 23 2000 - 12:17:40 EST


Tim Waugh wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 23, 2000 at 12:48:36PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> > * ChangeLogs for drivers/{char,sound,etc} would be nice, but may be
> > unreasonable. Documenting core and arch changes seems more important
> > than doc'ing driver changes.
>
> There already is a drivers/char/ChangeLog by the way, although it
> hasn't been touched in over a year. ;-)

Looks like tytso doesn't seem convincing. :)

Unfortunately, kernel changelogs imply Linus enforcement and Alan
agreement, otherwise it will fail miserably due to gaps in the docs....

        Jeff

-- 
Jeff Garzik              | Liberty is always dangerous, but
Building 1024            | it is the safest thing we have.
MandrakeSoft, Inc.       |      -- Harry Emerson Fosdick

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 23 2000 - 21:00:24 EST