Re: devfs - the missing link

From: Kent Overstreet (kent@kent.dyn.ns.ca)
Date: Mon May 22 2000 - 05:21:54 EST


On Mon, May 22, 2000 at 08:08:40PM +1000, Nathan Hand wrote:
> On Mon, May 22, 2000 at 12:55:04AM -0800, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> >
> > Procfs != devfs. Get that through your head first. Let's see what /proc is for:
> > I see a bunch of dirs for processes, some text files telling me about my system,
> > and a tree corrisponding to sysctl()s. Those ascii text files are decent for the
> > admin, but they've never been designed for programs to use them
>
> Actually, that's exactly what they were designed for.

I supposed I should have been clearer - I was talking about files like /proc/devices, cpuinfo,
filesystems, modules, etc. I've never heard anyone say those were for programs to use -
most of them are duplicates of ioctl() and sysctl() interfaces.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 23 2000 - 21:00:21 EST