Re: ide.2.2.15.20000509 patch breaks WDC31200F w/ VIA 82C586B

From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz (dake@staszic.waw.pl)
Date: Sun May 21 2000 - 13:04:47 EST

On 21 May 2000, Matthias Andree wrote:

> I then backed out the ide.2.2.15.20000509 patch and /dev/hdc was fine
> again. Note hdparm -i seems unaffected of these problems, the output

It might be unrelated but...

Some time ago I tried pre-2.2.16-2 + ide.2.2.15.20000504 with VIA82CXXX
support. Here is a result:

(...)
hda: ST52520A, ATA DISK drive
ide: Assuming 33MHz system bus speed for <-- this is OK
hdc: SAMSUNG WN312021A (1.2 GB), ATA DISK drive
hdd: ASUS CD-S360, ATAPI CDROM drive
ide0 at 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6 on irq 14
ide1 at 0x170-0x177,0x376 on irq 15
hda: ST52520A, 2446MB w/112kB Cache, CHS=621/128/63, DMA
hdc: SAMSUNG WN312021A (1.2 GB), 1151MB w/109kB Cache, CHS=2340/16/63, DMA
Partition check:
  hda: hda1 hda2 < hda5 hda6 hda7 hda8 hda9 hda10 hda11 >
  hdc: unknown partition table <-- this is not OK
(...)

Without VIA82CXXX compiled in:
(...)
Partition check:
  hda: hda1 hda2 < hda5 hda6 hda7 hda8 hda9 hda10 hda11 >
  hdc: [PTBL] [585/64/63] hdc1 hdc2
(...)

First I though that I screwed merging 2.2.16-2 and ide patch, but after
carefully reading sources I realised that there is very little possibility
of that.

First I though that I screwed merging 2.2.16-2 and ide patch, but after
carefully reading sources I realised that there is very little possibility
of that.

BTW: I have VIA 693A + 596B. It is recognised as 691 but it's OK. 

--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz

What are you looking for? Signature?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 23 2000 - 21:00:20 EST