Re: ACPI: is it at all relevant for other archs than ix86?

From: H. Peter Anvin (hpa@transmeta.com)
Date: Fri May 19 2000 - 23:28:33 EST

Next message: Andrey Savochkin: "Re: Correction: 2.2.15-SMP, eepro100, elusive boot failure"
Previous message: willy@thepuffingroup.com: "Re: Dell PE2400, SCSI and Cyclom-Y"
In reply to: Simon Richter: "Re: ACPI: is it at all relevant for other archs than ix86?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Followup to: <Pine.LNX.4.03.10005191636350.19537-100000@phobos.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de>
By author: Simon Richter <Simon.Richter@phobos.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> On 19 May 2000, Francis GALIEGUE wrote:
>
> Yes, for ia64 and probably Alpha and PowerPC.
>

Pretty much for any architecture which uses the PC platform. There
are definitely PC platform boards for IA64 and Alpha; I suspect there
are such for PowerPC as well.

-hpa

-- <hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private! "Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Andrey Savochkin: "Re: Correction: 2.2.15-SMP, eepro100, elusive boot failure"
Previous message: willy@thepuffingroup.com: "Re: Dell PE2400, SCSI and Cyclom-Y"
In reply to: Simon Richter: "Re: ACPI: is it at all relevant for other archs than ix86?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 23 2000 - 21:00:18 EST