Re: [SCARED] Is ext2 unreliable?

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Tue May 16 2000 - 10:04:04 EST


> I cannot run it w/o the patches, but the box is under heavy pressure all
> the time, ~160 samba connections and ~80 NFS connections concurrently,
> doing ~6.6MBytes/s sustained transfer rate on the eth. interface.

I cannot help you debug it with the patches - sorry. I can suggest you look
at 2.2.14/15 when doing heavy NFS. Old NFS code could leave files deleted but
never freed in some obscure cases and you may have the load to trigger that.
If so then 2.2.13/14/15 should be fine

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 23 2000 - 21:00:10 EST