Re: [PATCH] int (*readpage)(struct file *, struct page *);

• Next message: Alexander Viro: "Re: mounting a filesystem nowhere? (was Re: set_fs_pwd/set_fs_root(tsk, NULL, NULL) are OK?)"
• Previous message: Alexander Viro: "Re: [PATCH] int (*readpage)(struct file *, struct page *);"
• In reply to: Roman V. Shaposhnick: "[PATCH] int (*readpage)(struct file *, struct page *);"
• Next in thread: Jamie Lokier: "Re: [PATCH] int (*readpage)(struct file *, struct page *);"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, 8 May 2000, Roman V. Shaposhnick wrote:

> Linus, Al, and all others,
>
> please take a look at the yet another readpage patch and keep in mind,
> that it tries to do the following:
 
[snip]
 
Fine with me... Patch looks sane.

> [1] I wonder why struct dentry * is needed for a 'writepage' despite of it
> already has struct file * as a first parameter.

Histercal raisins... I'll check the history, can't tell for sure right now.
FWIC it deserves to die - it's obviously redundant.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Alexander Viro: "Re: mounting a filesystem nowhere? (was Re: set_fs_pwd/set_fs_root(tsk, NULL, NULL) are OK?)"
• Previous message: Alexander Viro: "Re: [PATCH] int (*readpage)(struct file *, struct page *);"
• In reply to: Roman V. Shaposhnick: "[PATCH] int (*readpage)(struct file *, struct page *);"
• Next in thread: Jamie Lokier: "Re: [PATCH] int (*readpage)(struct file *, struct page *);"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon May 15 2000 - 21:00:12 EST