Tigran Aivazian wrote:
> --- floppy.c.0 Sat Apr 22 18:32:16 2000
> +++ floppy.c Sat Apr 22 18:33:30 2000
> @@ -201,7 +201,7 @@
> static unsigned short virtual_dma_port=0x3f0;
> void floppy_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id, struct pt_regs * regs);
> static int set_dor(int fdc, char mask, char data);
> -static void register_devfs_entries (int drive);
> +static void register_devfs_entries (int drive) __init;
> static devfs_handle_t devfs_handle = NULL;
>
> #define K_64 0x10000 /* 64KB */
What are people's opinions on this?
Marking prototypes as __init is ugly and unnecessary IMNSHO, but making
a function's __init status obvious to code readers might be considered a
good thing.
Jeff
-- Jeff Garzik | Nothing cures insomnia like the Building 1024 | realization that it's time to get up. MandrakeSoft, Inc. | -- random fortune- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Apr 23 2000 - 21:00:21 EST