Re: memory handling in pre5/pre6

From: Lech Szychowski (lech.szychowski@pse.pl)
Date: Tue Apr 18 2000 - 04:01:14 EST

Next message: David S. Miller: "Re: memory handling in pre5/pre6"
Previous message: Hans Reiser: "Re: Are you all aware that there was a slight drop in performance in going from pre3 to pre5?"
In reply to: Rik van Riel: "Re: memory handling in pre5/pre6"
Next in thread: Martin Josefsson: "Re: memory handling in pre5/pre6"
Reply: Martin Josefsson: "Re: memory handling in pre5/pre6"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> Question is, have any of you actually noticed a performance
> hit because of this or are you just seeing different numbers
> than what you're used to and automatically assuming that it
> must be wrong?

I've noticed the machine dropping dead, that's why I'm worried.
It did not happen before even though I had just 128MB RAM and
the machine was doing pretty much the same.

-- Leszek.

-- lech7@pse.pl 2:480/33.7 -- REAL programmers use INTEGERS -- -- speaking just for myself...

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: David S. Miller: "Re: memory handling in pre5/pre6"
Previous message: Hans Reiser: "Re: Are you all aware that there was a slight drop in performance in going from pre3 to pre5?"
In reply to: Rik van Riel: "Re: memory handling in pre5/pre6"
Next in thread: Martin Josefsson: "Re: memory handling in pre5/pre6"
Reply: Martin Josefsson: "Re: memory handling in pre5/pre6"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Apr 23 2000 - 21:00:12 EST