Richard B. Johnson <root@chaos.analogic.com> wrote:
>Shouldn't the macro be fixed (if broken)? MIN is used a lot in the
>source. Several years ago I made one in which the input parameters were
>not evaluated twice and it was __static__ __inline__. This was not
>accepted, perhaps it's time?
What about:
#define MIN(a,b) ({typeof(a) _a_=(a), _b_=(b); _a_ < _b_ ? _a_ : _b_; })
It's my favourite MIN macro, but it's also a gcc extension.
Peter
--
_ x ___ p.steiner@t-online.de (Peter Steiner)
/ \_/_\_ /,--' Linux User #55148 (http://counter.li.org/)
\/>'~~~~//
\_____/ perl -e'while(<>){s/=\n//g;s/=([\dA-F]{2})/chr(hex($1))/eg;print;}'
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Apr 23 2000 - 21:00:11 EST