Lech Szychowski <lech.szychowski@pse.pl> writes:
> > total: used: free: shared: buffers: cached:
> > Mem: 523837440 520978432 2859008 0 117579776 313892864
> > Swap: 402096128 45477888 356618240
> > MemTotal: 511560 kB
> > MemFree: 2792 kB
> > MemShared: 0 kB
> > Buffers: 114824 kB
> > Cached: 306536 kB
> > HighTotal: 0 kB
> > HighFree: 0 kB
> > LowTotal: 511560 kB
> > LowFree: 2792 kB
> > SwapTotal: 392672 kB
> > SwapFree: 348260 kB
>
> total: used: free: shared: buffers: cached:
> Mem: 523792384 520155136 3637248 0 46567424 389492736
> Swap: 542826496 77524992 465301504
> MemTotal: 511516 kB
> MemFree: 3552 kB
> MemShared: 0 kB
> Buffers: 45476 kB
> Cached: 380364 kB
> HighTotal: 0 kB
> HighFree: 0 kB
> LowTotal: 511516 kB
> LowFree: 3552 kB
> SwapTotal: 530104 kB
> SwapFree: 454396 kB
>
> > I've never had this machine swapping before (last version before these
> > was 2.3.47). I don't know what changed but it wasn't a good change.
> > The machine has enough memory to do its job and it's not necesary to
> > keep everything in the cache.
> > Again, this is a unmodified 2.3.99-pre6 on a 2xPIII machine.
>
> All I can say is "same here"...
Same here,
but what i notice is that it only start to show up
when using X...
I'm thinking of a shm problem,
any clue ?
--
-- Yoann, http://prelude.sourceforge.net
It is well known that M$ products don't call free() after a malloc().
The Unix community wish them good luck for their future developments.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Apr 23 2000 - 21:00:10 EST