Re: posix_fadvise

From: Ulrich Drepper (drepper@redhat.com)
Date: Fri Apr 14 2000 - 15:56:54 EST


Jamie Lokier <lk@tantalophile.demon.co.uk> writes:

> Ok. You should be aware that the present Linux implementation of
> MADV_DONTNEED is "nukes dirty data". Do you have a POSIX standard that
> says POSIX MADV_DONTNEED should be similar to POSIX_FADV_DONTNEED?

Yes. But this shouldn't be a problem. Nobody says that nuking isn't OK.

-- 
---------------.      drepper at gnu.org  ,-.   1325 Chesapeake Terrace
Ulrich Drepper  \    ,-------------------'   \  Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA
Red Hat          `--' drepper at redhat.com   `------------------------

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Apr 15 2000 - 21:00:25 EST